Interactive Demo · No Upload Required

Step Through AI Building Your Proposal
in 3 Minutes

Click through 5 real steps — the same workflow WinRFP AI runs on your live RFPs. On each step, click Run to watch the AI work, then Next → to continue. All outputs below are AI-generated from the sample solicitation.

Sample RFP:  DHS Cybersecurity Operations Center Support Services  ·  HSHQDC-26-R-00042  ·  $15M · Small Business Set-Aside
1
Analyze RFP
2
Library Readiness
2
Bid / No-Bid
3
Compliance
4
Executive Summary
5
Red Team
Step 1 — RFP Analysis
AI reads the solicitation and extracts everything that matters
SOLICITATION: HSHQDC-26-R-00042
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) requires Cybersecurity Operations Center (CSOC) Support Services to augment DHS's existing cybersecurity capability. The contractor shall provide a fully staffed and operational 24×7 Security Operations Center, Tier 1–3 analyst support, threat intelligence, incident response, and SIEM platform management. Period of Performance: Base year + 4 option years. NAICS: 541512. Estimated value: $15,000,000. Proposals due 30 days from solicitation release…
AI is reading 47 pages and extracting key intelligence…
Agency
DHS / OCIO
Solicitation #
HSHQDC-26-R-00042
NAICS Code
541512
Set-Aside
Small Business
Contract Value
~$15M (5 yrs)
Contract Type
Cost-Plus Fixed Fee
Security Clearance
Secret (Required)
Proposal Due
July 14, 2026 · 4:00 PM ET

AI-Extracted Key Requirements

  • 24×7 Security Operations Center staffing — minimum 8 FTE Tier 1–3 SOC analysts at all times
  • SIEM platform management (Splunk or equivalent) — ingest, tuning, custom dashboards
  • Threat intelligence integration with ISACs, CISA feeds, and classified threat databases
  • Incident response (IR) with ≤ 15-minute detection-to-notification SLA for Priority 1 incidents
  • Monthly security posture reporting to DHS CISO and OMB per FISMA requirements
  • Continuous Authorization to Operate (ATO) maintenance under NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
  • Key personnel: Program Manager, SOC Lead, and ISSO named in proposal (cannot be subbed after award)
Step 2 — Knowledge Library Readiness
The AI reads your company documents and scores how ready your library is to win — by category, with gaps flagged. (Illustrative example.)

A strong library is what makes every later step accurate — the analysis, the bid score, and the drafted sections all pull from it. Here’s how ready this sample library is for the solicitation.

Scoring your library against the solicitation…
70
/ 100 · Good
Past Performance
78 · 35%
Capability
72 · 30%
Resumes
72 · 20%
Certifications
35 · 10%
Pricing
62 · 5%
Certifications is your weak spot (35). Add SBA / ISO / clearance docs and re-score — every draft gets stronger.
Step 3 — Bid / No-Bid Score
AI scores your competitive position and recommends whether to pursue

AI evaluates the RFP against typical small business capabilities and GovCon win factors to generate a data-driven pursue recommendation.

Weighing 12 competitive factors…
Pursue score · should you bid?
74
/ 100
 Recommend: BID
Technical Fit
82
Past Performance
70
Key Personnel
65
Set-Aside Match
100
Price Competitiveness
60

Gap: Key personnel roster and Secret-cleared résumés need to be identified before proposal kickoff. Teaming with a cleared subcontractor recommended to strengthen technical staffing.

Step 4 — Compliance Matrix
Every "shall" and "must" requirement mapped and tagged automatically

AI parses every section to extract mandatory requirements and maps them to your proposal outline — ready to export to Word or CSV.

Extracting 31 "shall" statements across 8 sections…
§ Ref Requirement Type Status
SOW 3.1 Provide 24×7 SOC staffing with minimum 8 cleared FTEs on-site at all times Technical Needs Resume
SOW 3.2 Manage and tune SIEM platform; ingest all DHS network log sources within 30 days of start Technical Addressed
SOW 3.4 Detect and notify CO of Priority 1 incidents within ≤ 15 minutes of detection SLA Addressed
Section L Technical volume shall not exceed 30 pages (12pt Times New Roman, 1-inch margins) Format Compliant
Section L Price/Cost volume must include basis of estimate and supporting documentation for all labor categories Pricing In Progress
Section H Key Personnel (PM, SOC Lead, ISSO) named; substitution requires CO written approval Personnel Needs Identify
CDRL A001 Monthly Security Posture Report due NLT 5th business day of following month Deliverable Addressed
FAR 52.204 SAM.gov registration active at time of proposal submission and throughout performance Admin Compliant

Showing 8 of 31 extracted requirements. Full matrix exports to Word/CSV on Solo plan and above.

Proposal Readiness · illustrative 58%
Basis: 5 of 8 mandatory requirements addressed; key personnel and pricing still open. Illustrative — your real numbers depend on your library and solicitation.
Step 5 — Executive Summary Draft
AI writes a tailored Executive Summary grounded in your RFP and company profile

On your real proposal, this draft pulls from your Knowledge Library — capability statements, past performance, and key personnel data. Below is AI-generated from the sample solicitation alone.

Generating Executive Summary aligned to Section M evaluation factors…

[Your Company Name] is uniquely positioned to deliver the Department of Homeland Security with a high-performing, scalable Cybersecurity Operations Center that protects critical federal infrastructure while remaining within budget. As a HUBZone-certified small business with over a decade of DHS-adjacent cybersecurity experience, we bring proven SOC expertise, cleared personnel, and a mature processes framework that directly maps to the requirements of HSHQDC-26-R-00042.

Our proposed SOC solution leverages a Splunk-native architecture with pre-built DHS log source connectors, enabling full SIEM ingestion within 15 days of contract start — half the required 30-day timeline. Our SOC analysts average 8 years of federal cybersecurity experience and hold active Secret clearances, with three TS/SCI-cleared leads available for Priority 1 escalations. Our documented mean-time-to-detect (MTTD) for Priority 1 incidents across three prior federal SOC contracts is 9 minutes — well within the 15-minute SLA specified in SOW Section 3.4.

We deliver continuous FISMA compliance, monthly posture reporting that exceeds CDRL A001 requirements, and a transition plan that eliminates service disruption risk. Our Program Manager, [Name], brings 12 years of DHS program leadership; our ISSO, [Name], has maintained four ATOs under NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with zero compliance findings. We are ready to begin Day 1.

Word count: 238 ⏱ Estimated reading: 1.2 min Section M factors addressed: 4/5 [Placeholders] need company-specific data
Proposal Readiness · illustrative 72%
Basis: Executive Summary drafted — 4 of 5 Section M factors addressed; placeholders still need your company data. Illustrative — your real numbers depend on your library and solicitation.
Step 6 — Red Team Review
AI evaluator scores your draft as a hostile evaluator would — before you submit

The Red Team simulates a skeptical government evaluator reviewing your Executive Summary against the Section M evaluation criteria.

Adversarially reviewing against all Section M evaluation criteria…
CRITICAL — Key Personnel Not Named
The Executive Summary references a Program Manager and ISSO by placeholder "[Name]". Section H requires key personnel to be named in the proposal. An evaluator will score this as non-compliant and may deem the entire proposal non-responsive. Action: Identify and confirm named individuals before submission.
CRITICAL — Clearance Claim Unsubstantiated
The draft claims "three TS/SCI-cleared leads" but provides no résumés or SF-86 references to support this. Without substantiation, an evaluator will assign a Risk rating of "High" on the Staffing factor. Action: Attach résumé summaries or provide verification mechanism in the technical volume.
MEDIUM — No Subcontractor Teaming Plan
The bid/no-bid analysis flagged a staffing gap for cleared SOC analysts. The Executive Summary does not mention a teaming arrangement. Evaluators may question capacity to staff 24×7 from a single small business. Consider adding one sentence acknowledging your teaming strategy.
STRENGTH — Quantified MTTD Claim
The 9-minute mean-time-to-detect claim with three-contract reference is compelling and directly addresses the 15-minute SLA. If substantiated with a past performance reference in the Technical volume, this is a discriminating strength that evaluators will note favorably.
Draft grade · quality vs Section M
C+
This is your starting draft, before revision — strong technical substance, but 2 critical compliance gaps to resolve before submission. Both are fixable in under 2 hours with the right data.
Proposal Readiness · illustrative 80%
Basis: Red Team turned unknown risk into a concrete fix list — 2 critical gaps named (named personnel, clearance evidence). Resolving them is what moves this toward submission-ready (~92%); it isn't automatic. Illustrative — your real numbers depend on your library and solicitation.
AI analyzes full 100-page RFPs in under 60 seconds
31 requirements extracted automatically — zero manual reading
Used by GovCon firms from 2-person shops to $50M/yr contractors